Growth parameters for Chelidonichthys kumu
 
Maximum Length 60cm TL
n = 12
Note that studies where Loo is very different (+/- 1/3) from Lmax are doubtful.
Lm vs Linf graph [n = 3]
Reproductive graph [n = 3]
M vs K graph [n = 1]
M vs Linf graph [n = 1]
Longevity vs 3/K graph [n = 4]
ø = 2.92
L inf = 45.7 cm FL
K = 0.4
Median record no. 7
54100Ref. 54100
Loo
(cm)
Length Type K
(1/y)
t0
(years)
Sex M
(1/y)
Temp° C Lm Ø' Country Locality Questionable Captive
28.8 FL 0.549 -0.55 M 11.0 23.0 2.66 New Zealand Hauraki Gulf, 36.5°S 175°E Yes No
36.4 FL 0.641 0.19 F 11.0 23.0 2.93 New Zealand Hauraki Gulf, 36.5°S 175°E Yes No
36.5 FL 0.580 -0.07 M 2.89 Australia New South Wales (32.4°- 33.6°S) No No
39.4 FL 0.640 -0.06 F 3.00 Australia New South Wales (32.4°- 33.6°S) No No
40.3 FL 0.370 M 12.0 2.78 New Zealand South Island, west coast (GUR 7) No No
42.2 FL 0.490 M 12.0 2.94 New Zealand South Island, SE coast (GUR 3) No No
45.7 FL 0.400 F 12.0 2.92 New Zealand South Island, west coast (GUR 7) No No
48.2 FL 0.440 F 12.0 3.01 New Zealand South Island, SE coast (GUR 3) No No
52.0 0.406 0.25 3.04 New Zealand Pegasus Bay, Canterbury No No
54.8 TL 0.494 10.0 3.17 Japan No No
54.9 FL 0.406 0.29 11.0 23.0 3.09 New Zealand Pegasus Bay, Canterbury (45°S 173°E) No No
57.8 FL 0.200 0.28 2.82 New Zealand New Zealand No No
Search for more references: Scirus
Back to Search
Add New Record
Back to Top

Publish in our journal partners Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria (Impact factor 2023: 1.17; link to old content 1970-2020), Journal of Applied Ichthyology (Impact factor 2022: 1.222) and Journal of Fish Biology (2.0, 2022 impact factor) the results of your primary research on fish growth, weight-length relationships, reproduction (maturity, fecundity, spawning), food and diet composition, introductions and range extensions for faster subsequent entry in FishBase.

cfm script by eagbayani, 05.04.99 ,  php script by elaxamana, 11/02/09 ,  last modified by sortiz, 06/03/17